Dear Paul:
There
is much in the news about Venezuela. And much of it is false. We at
WFPNE believe that the situation in Venezuela requires scrutiny, and
watchfulness. Below are some facts about the protests, written by our
friends at the Center for Economic Policy Research, Alexander Main and
Dan Beeton. In the next weeks, we will be sending opportunities for
solidarity action on this crucial issue. And those of you who live near
Providenc, RI, will have an opportunity to delve into this crucial issue
at a presentation and discussion on the evening of April 11th. More information will be forthcoming. Please feel free to reply to this email to let us know about upcoming Venezuela events in your area. In peace, Susan
Quick points regarding the protests in Venezuela
This is not a spontaneous wave of student protests, but a planned campaign organized by radical rightwing opposition leaders
including Leopoldo Lopez and Maria Corina Machado. On January 23, Lopez
and Machado launched their “La Salida” (“The Exit”) campaign with a
press conference. As shown in this video,
they stated that the goal is the ouster of the democratically-elected
Maduro government, and the means would be by, as Machado put,
“creat[ing] chaos in the streets.” “Let’s ignite the streets,” she said.
“Every corner, every market, every school and university.”
The protests seek to accomplish through extra-legal means what the opposition has been unable to accomplish at the ballot box. Reuters reported
just after the opposition suffered a clear defeat in municipal
elections in December that “Several other opposition leaders have
advocated more confrontational tactics, such as street protests, against
Maduro.”
Key figures within the opposition have rejected the "Salida" protest campaign,
which aims to remove the government via street protests. As the
campaign was gearing up, state governor and former presidential
candidate Henrique Capriles said
"I don't believe in violent removals [of governments] (...) A struggle
with violent characteristics that prevents us from finding the path
toward achieving the country that we love? There's no doubt that isn't
our struggle."
The protests have been violent; protesters have killed more people that government security forces.
At least four people, including National Guard officers and municipal
workers, have been shot and killed while attempting to remove protester
barricades. Another seven or so have been killed attempting to get
through barricades and crashing into obstructions or other hazards
deliberately put in their way by protesters. These include two people
who died after riding motorcycles into wire strung across the road, one
of whom was decapitated.
Some major media headlines reveal the violent nature of the protests and roadblocks, at odds with social media portrayals of “peaceful protests” and congressional statements along such lines:
Venezuelan Attorney General Luisa Ortega has recognized that some
security forces have engaged in “excesses” but has highlighted judicial
actions taken to hold security agents accountable for alleged abuses. According to Reuters, Luisa Ortega told the press that since
the start of the demonstrations, state prosecutors have opened 60
investigations into alleged human rights violations and imprisoned 15
officials in connection with those incidents.
Prominent protest leaders have an anti-democratic and sometimes violent history.
Leopoldo Lopez participated in the 2002 coup d’etat that temporarily
overthrew the democratically-elected government. As mayor of Chacao at
the time, Lopez oversaw the violent arrest
of the Interior Minister as he was dragged out of the building where he
had taken refuge and beaten by an angry mob. As governor of the
now-defunct Federal District of Caracas, now Metropolitan Mayor of
Caracas Antonio Ledezma oversaw a violent police crackdown on protests
in 1992 in which protesters were killed.
Maria Corina Machado was among those present at the presidential palace
when the 2002 coup regime headed by Pedro Carmona dissolved the
congress, the constitution and the Supreme Court.
The Maduro government has repeatedly asked for dialogue since the
protests began, only to be rebuffed by some opposition leaders. Maduro
invited opposition leaders to a meeting on February 24 but opposition
leader Henrique Capriles rejected the offer. Opposition business leaders
did attend however, including Jorge Roig, the president of the main
business federation, and Lorenzo Mendoza, head of food and beverage
giant Empresas Polar. Bloomberg quoted Roig as saying “We have profound
differences with your economic system and your political systems but
democracy, thank God, lets us evaluate these differences.”
Latin American leaders from across the political spectrum have
condemned the violent protests and expressed their solidarity with the
Maduro government. The Organization of American States issued
a declaration of “Solidarity and Support for Democratic Institutions,
Dialogue, and Peace” in Venezuela. The Union of South American Nations
issued a statement supporting the Venezuelan government’s efforts to
foster dialogue and expressing concern over "any threat to the
independence and sovereignty of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela."
Chilean president Michelle Bachelet has stated that "we will never
support a movement that wants to violently overthrow a
constitutionally-elected government,” and proclaimed “the Chilean
government's willingness to support & help the Venezuelan people
& government.” In a letter to Maduro
on the anniversary of Hugo Chavez’s death, former president of Brazil
Lula da Silva praised Venezuela’s democratic and economic system and
referred to “forces ready to violate the constitutional order” in
Venezuela.
The Catholic Church has condemned violence by protesters as well as government security forces.
Cardinal Jorge Urosa Sabino of Caracas stated,
“We…reject the deaths caused by roadblocks presumably put in place by
protesters and the disproportionate use of force in repressive actions,
which has lead [sic] to some deaths and a large number of wounded,” and
called for dialogue.
The Latin American Council of Churches, a regional ecumenical organization whose members include 175 Latin American churches in every country in the region, issued a statement on February 28 th that stated: “We
have seen in the protests in this month of February in Venezuela,
directed by the opposition, that their own leaders have confessed the
aim of "regime change". The Venezuelan Constitution offers the
possibility of a revocative referendum half way through the term of a
presidency, and in that legal and democratic way a government can be
changed. However, the recent opposition protests (…) have demonstrated
the impatient claims of the opposition, that don't want to wait to move
forward legally (…) The protests are legitimate in their call for
greater security, against shortages and inflation, but the demand for a
"regime change" does not match the democratic will of the majority of
the Venezuelan people expressed in the last elections in 2013.”
The protesters do not have broad support, but are mainly comprised of upper- and middle-class Venezuelans. Numerous
media reports have noted that the road blockades have mainly been in
wealthier areas, and that the protesters have failed to broaden their
movement to lower-income sectors of the population.
Recent elections and opinion polls both show the Maduro government with strong majority support. Political parties aligned with the Maduro government won municipal elections in December with a 10-point margin of victory
over the opposition. Prior to these elections, the opposition had
framed them as a referendum on Maduro’s government, a line which was
picked up in the international media.
A poll conducted in early March by polling firm Pronóstico, and described in Venezuela’s largest-circulation newspaper, Últimas Noticias, shows that a strong majority of the 2,400 people surveyed in Caracas and Carabobo – 64% -- oppose the current protests.
They also show that if presidential elections were to be held now,
Maduro would receive more votes than all the leading opposition figures
combined.
The U.S. administration has adopted positions that clash with those of nearly all the governments of the region. Declarations
from the State Department and the White House have portrayed the
protests as peaceful and democratic and placed all the blame for the
recent violence on the Venezuelan government. Secretary of State John Kerry has stated
that President Maduro is waging a “terror campaign” against the
Venezuelan people and said that sanctions against Venezuelan officials
are being considered. Only
the U.S., Canada and the rightwing government of Panama refused to sign
on to the OAS declaration of “solidarity and support” of Venezuela’s
democratic institutions.
In the U.S. Congress, sanctions legislation was introduced by Rep. Ileana Ros Lehtinen (R-FL) in the House and Senator Bob Menendez (D-FL) in the Senate on March 13 th. The Menendez bill – The Venezuela Defense of Human Rights and Civil Society Act
– “requires President Obama to impose sanctions on persons that have
been involved in serious human rights violations against peaceful
demonstrators and others in Venezuela or that have directed or ordered
the arrest or prosecution of a person due to their legitimate exercise
of freedom of expression or assembly.” It also “authorizes $15 million
in new funding in the FY2015 budget to defend human rights, support
democratic civil society organizations, assist independent media, and
strengthen good governance and the rule of law in the face of the
massive violence and repression”, according to the Menendez press
release.
The Ros Lehtinen bill has the same name as the Helms Burton Act, with the name of Cuba replaced by Venezuela: the Venezuelan Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act. It
contains three different forms of sanctions, a statement of policy for
reducing oil imports from Venezuela and a "strategy" section that
recycles various passages from the Helms Burton Act including the demand
that Venezuela move “toward a market-oriented economic system based on
the right to own and enjoy property” and make “constitutional changes
that would ensure regular free and fair elections.”
|
No comments:
Post a Comment